Saturday, April 15, 2017

Koreans need to create and own the NARRATIVE of the Korean War and what came after

"All this craziness would be ended if the US signed a peace treaty with North Korea ending the first Korean War and opened up diplomatic and commercial relations. No need for war or missile threats. North Korea is a horrid, brutal regime. But so is Egypt, whose tin pot dictator was wined and dined by Trump last week."

The problem is Koreans are dogs. They have no agency.

If Koreans were Jews, they would have owned the Narrative and applied moral pressure on the US long ago. After all, Jews came to own the WWII narrative. Jews spun it to serve their own passions and interests. Jewish Narrative goes as follows: Because of Western complicity in the Holocaust, the West MUST support Israel, creation and preservation(and even expansion). Also, even though the US narrative is "Americans defeated Nazi Germany and made the world safe for freedom", the Jewish narrative is "America didn't act fast enough to stop Hitler, and that is why so many Jews died."
Jews have this Chosen People mentality, and they feel as the axis of the world. Others must revolve around them and serve them. Also, they are great storytellers, and they told their own stories and narrative of WWII. So, Jews own the moral narrative of WWII.

Koreans could easily own the narrative of the Korean War. But Koreans are, by nature, doggish. For 1000s of yrs, they've been dogs to big China. Their mentality is to serve the Great Power. When Japan took over Korea, most Koreans were servile collaborators and served Japan. When Japan lost and US became the big power in south, South Koreans became dogs of the US, and North Koreans became dogs of Soviets. (Korean War and Chinese intervention made North Korea less slavish to USSR. Unlike South Korea that had only one master, North Korea had two and played a game of leaning one way or another.) Because of their slavish mentality, most North Koreans became mindless dogs of North Korean elite. And because of its slavish mentality, South Korea became a dog of the US as its master and lord. To be sure, there was a large left-nationalist anti-American movement in South Korea in its early yrs. They caused trouble and had to be wiped out in the tune of 100,000s. At any rate, the elites of South Korea became as much collaborators to US empire as Korean elites under Japanese had been collaborators of Japanese empire. When Japanese empire sent Koreans to kill Chinese, Koreans did. When US empire sent Koreans to kill Vietnamese, Koreans did. And Korea also took part in the invasion of Iraq. Dogs.

There was a strong anti-American protest movement for awhile, and eventually democracy was achieved, but this made South Korea even more slavish to the US. When South Korea was military dictatorship, many Koreans resisted US influence as the power behind the political tyranny. But once South Korea got democracy with approval from the US, the resistance grew weaker and weaker. When Koreans equated US with support of military rule, they were more critical of American power. But now that Koreans equate their democracy with US Power, they have become totally uncritical of US rule. (Also, institutionalization of Korea made people more robot-like, especially with advent with internet and its hive culture.) Today, South Korea has no vision of itself except as an imitation of the US, even in multi-culti madness and feminism. It even has 'gay pride parades'. Korean mentality is US KNOW BEST, like the TV show 'Father Knows Best'. Whatever US does, it must be good, so Korea must follow? 'Gay marriage' in the US? It must be good! Korea must follow because Korea is inferior and just a dog of the US.

Because of such slavish mentality, Koreans never came to own the Korean War Narrative. North Korean version is just a pile of horse-dung. It's cult of Kim Dynasty. But South Korean narrative is hardly better. According to the SK narrative, US is the wonderful and noble friend-ally-savior that protected the South from the North. The South also praises the US for having liberated Korea from Japanese rule.
South Koreans stick with narrative that flatters the US while reducing itself to the damsel in distress saved by Uncle Sam. This makes South Koreans feel indebted to the US. This makes them feel morally inferior and forever in debt to Uncle Sam as god.

But the US narrative on Korea is mostly baloney. The 'liberation' was phony. Indeed, true liberation didn't happen. Also, it was an accident of history. The US had no interest in human rights for Korea. Theodore Roosevelt praised Japan's invasion of Korea. Woodrow Wilson ignored Korean pleas for national sovereignty. The tacit agreement between Japan and US was "We Americans take Philippines, and you Japanese take Korea. Wink-wink."

And even when FDR pressed Japan, the condition was Japan could keep Manchuria, Korea, and Taiwan. There was no US concern for rights of Koreans.
It was because of the war with Japan that the US found itself playing the role of 'liberator' of Asia from evil Japanese. So, what was America's idea of liberating Asia? It asked the USSR to invade and take over North Asia. FDR also offered Stalin all of Korea, a plan later amended by Truman whereby Korea was to be divided among superpowers like Poland was divided by Nazi Germany and USSR to kick off WWII. Imagine that. WWII began with Nazi Germany and USSR dividing Poland(an innocent nation), and it ended with USSR and US diving Korea, another innocent nation. (US and USSR also played games in Palestine, thus leading to Zionist imperialist takeover and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians whose fate is worse than Koreans under Japanese rule).

US narrative would have us believe that Korea got divided by some accident: Somehow, US and USSR ended up meeting the middle of Korea, and oh well, that's how Korea got divided. Not true. The USSR was initially reluctant to fight in Asia, especially as it had signed a peace treaty with Japan and also because Soviets had already lost 20 million in fighting Germans. It was the US that asked USSR to enter China and Korea. It was US decision that sealed the fate of Korea. And that was so-called 'liberation' for Korea. Korea got divided against its will, and the north came under occupation of Stalinist goons and the South came under occupation of US puppets. Some liberation! There was no real liberation. Korea will not be liberated until it is unified and US military moves out. Only then will Korea be truly free, united, and autonomous. The regime installed by Stalin still rules North Korea. So, North Korea is still poisoned by the Stalinist-Kim legacy. As for the South, it is still a whore-puppet of the US. South Korea claims to be democratic, but what good is a democracy when every leader elected by South Koreans is just another puppet-dog of the US(that is now controlled by Zionists and homos)? South Koreans don't elect leaders or true presidents. They elect puppets who take orders from the US. Also, South Korean elites are just like Korean elites during Japanese Colonialist period.

Back then, many Koreans went to Japan to study and served the Japanese Empire. They tried to convince Koreans to let go of their identity, culture, heritage, and patriotism. They urged Koreans to become globo-Japanese, or 'New Japanese', of the Greater East-Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere. Today, South Korean elites are collaborators of the Jewish-Homo-controlled US globalist empire. It copies, imitates, and obeys everything globo-American. So, if the US is about homo-worship, South Korea must follow. If the US is about black thug rap music, Koreans must imitate. If Hollywood promotes white beauty, then Korean women must dye their hair blonde and get plastic surgery to look white. If Western women are into slut culture and bitchy feminism, then Korean women do likewise.

Korean intellectual culture is a dog-like imitation of globalism. Jews control the West and promote multi-culturalism and diversity in order to weaken the native gentile majority. More diversity among gentiles means Jews can play divide-and-rule among them. The reason why British ruled India for so long was because India was diverse. Brits could pit one group against another. In contrast, Brits had a harder time ruling over China since Chinese were one people and united in opposition. Austro-Hungarian Empire also lasted a long time because of its diversity. The Austrian minority rulers, aided by Jews, played divide-and-rule among various groups. Naturally, Jewish globalists want to increase diversity in South Korea to weaken its nationalism. If South Korea fills up with non-Koreans, or 'New Koreans' as Korean collaborators call them, then the globalists can accuse South Korea of 'racism', 'intolerance' and etc. Thus morally bullied and paralyzed, South Korea will have to make more and more concessions. In time, it will end up like Sweden which is now falling apart. And London is now a Muslim city in huge areas. Both Sweden and UK took the advice of globalist Jews. Bad idea.

But these collaborator globo-Koreans have no vision of Korean survival or patriotism. They want to turn Korea into a copy of California. They see Korea only as a wanna-be-America, and they themselves are not true Koreans but wanna-be-Americans. (Indeed, the idea of a 'true Korean' is supposed to be 'racist' and offensive.) This is especially true of Korean women whose dream is to reject inferior Korean men and offer their wombs to superior men to produce babies for white men, Jewish men, and black men. This is globalism, and it will destroy Korea. Also, as South Korea becomes taken over by 'New Koreans' --- foreigners who come to Korea only for money and material interests --- , it will become racially, ethnically, and culturally so different from North Koreans that the two Koreas will never unite.
Even real Koreans in South Korea have lost a sense of connection with North Koreans. So, why would 'New Koreans' --- Indians, Burmese, Filipinos, Malaysians, Indonesians, Africans, etc --- feel any affinity and sense of shared identity with North Koreans? Korean-ness used to be about blood, roots, land, history, culture. It had rich and deep meaning. Now, it's all about materialism, pop culture(K-pop where Koreans go trans-racial with plastic surgery and blonde hair dyes), hedonism, and atomized individual. It is just a T-shirt than the body and soul. It's something Koreans can just take off and abandon as they move to America to become an American instead. And it's just something anyone can put on and become 'new Korean'. A once rich and deep identity has been turned into a piece of legal document. But then, Korean elites are now even saying illegal aliens in Korea should be 'new Koreans' and be given voting rights. South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world, mass immigration, and emigration fever(as 80% of South Koreans want to abandon their identity, culture, and nation forever to take on new nationalities; Koreans don't see their nation as their sacred homeland but as a ghetto. So, Koreans should move to better nations like US, Canada, and Australia while South Korea is abandoned to other Asians and even Africans as 'new Koreans'; this is what happens when a people lose their sense of blood, land, history, and culture). This is a recipe for disaster. Globalism has cut Koreans from their roots. So, Koreans no longer see their nation as their sacred homeland in which their ancestors from time immemorial are buried. They just see it as real estate property, all about dollars and cents and factories and shops.
Japanese tried to wipe out Korean history, Korean identity, and Korean language, BUT things are worse now, and it is Koreans who are waging war on their own Korean-ness(not least in imitation of white nations that are also committed to racial suicide). Korean-globalist collaborators seek to dilute Korean identity to the point that anyone can become 'New Korean'. These Koreans tell other Asians to give up their identities and cultures and become 'New Korean'. And by weakening Korean-ness, they demoralize real Koreans who no longer feel special in their own nation. The idea of 'New Korean' means that real Koreans don't own Korea. After all, if anyone can come to Korea and become a 'New Korean', then Korea belongs to the world. There are 1.3 billion Chinese, 1.3 billion Indians, 220 million Indonesians, 85 million Vietnamese, and etc. South Korea's message to all those people is "come and take over our country and become 'new Koreans'". Koreans don't care because they no longer feel a deep ethnic, cultural, and historical connection to their land. Because younger generation of Koreans have been raised as globalists, most of them want to un-Koreanize themselves and become 'Americans', 'Australians', or 'Canadians'. And globalized Korean women now see their own men as inferior and dream of going to the West to use their wombs to produce babies for superior men, usually white, Jewish, or black.

Anyway, Koreans have failed to own the Narrative of the Korean War. It was a great crime and tragedy in which 3 million Koreans died. (Some estimates go as high as 4 million). And yet, Koreans rely on OTHER peoples to shape the narrative. It'd be like Jews depending on Germans and others to define WWII and the Holocaust.

The Korean War was like World War Three concentrated in a small peninsula. Though called 'Korean War', it wasn't just a civil war among Koreans. It was created by the division imposed by the US in collusion with USSR. Also, the US triggered the war by removing its troops from South Korea and then declaring to the world that it wouldn't defend South Korea. US did this with full knowledge that the North was amassing troops along the border.
In other words, US gave green light to Stalin, Mao, and Kim to take the South. So, the invasion began and the nation. Still, there was the hope for the unification of Korea, even if under a Stalinist regime. But then, the US decided to change its mind and enter the war.
In doing so, it committed a holocaust against Koreans with its massive air campaign that deliberately targeted mostly civilians. North Korea was a backward nation, but US dropped more bombs on North Korea than on Japan or Germany in WWII. US decided to kill as many Koreans as possible to clear the way for US troops. Also, US had lots of weapon stockpile left over from WWII, and the war industry decided Korea as a convenient place to dump them.
It had no concern for men, women, and children.
So, what happened was clearly genocide. Jews make a big deal of the Holocaust. But Koreans? They are silent about US holocaust against Koreans. Armenians don't forget their own holocaust at hands of Turks. And Ukrainians don't forget Holodomor carried out by Soviets. But Koreans are silent about the holocaust from the air carried out by the US. These US bombings targeted entire cities and killed as many civilians as possible. These were not acts of war but genocide.

Anyway, one positive outcome of US advance up north was hope for unification. But then, China panicked and got read to for. Mao feared that once US takes Korea, it will work with Taiwan to wage war on China. So, China entered the War. US had also brought along lots of UN nations. So, in effect, Korean War became like a mini-WWIII where all the hellfire was concentrated on a tiny peninsula.
This all happened because the US divided Korea and gave half to Stalin(like Hitler divided Poland and gave half to Stalin). And then, US carried out some of the worst war crimes in any century by willfully targeting civilians and possibly killing over a million of them through air campaigns of total destruction. (US would also divide Vietnam, foment a war there, and then kill millions and bring along South Korea as collaborator to kill, rape, and destroy Vietnam too).

Now, let's look back a bit. Initially, the US and Japan worked jointly to divide Asia. US honored Japan's takeover of Korea, and Japan honored America's takeover of Philippines. They were in the process of cutting up Asia like a cake. So, US never had good intentions toward Korea. It was the War of Empires between US and Japan that made the US an accidental 'liberator' of Korea. And what was the American idea of liberating Korea? Divide it in half and let Stalin have the north. (How is dividing an innocent not a great crime against humanity?)
And then, the trick was to work with Rhee, US puppet, to wipe out all opposition and install a pro-American regime. The division of Korea was not like the division of Germany. Germany started WWII. It was the main aggressor. In contrast, Korea was a colony of Japan and hadn't done anything to deserve such a fate. But US kept Japan whole and divided Korea. Korea got punished even though it didn't do anything wrong. If anything, it had been a victim-nation of Japan. US never acknowledged its role in this very great crime. It never apologized. Likewise, it never apologized to Palestinians about what happened with Nakba. Palestine got divided around the same time, triggering a war in which Jews ethnically cleansed most Palestinians and took over all of Palestine and named it 'Israel'.

If US won't face up to its historical responsibility, then Koreans should forge a narrative that honestly addresses history. But there is silence and cowardice among Koreans. Korean elites and Korean-American elites are all mum, timid, and obedient. They should be the ones to morally pressure the US to come clean about its role in Korea. They should say North Korea exists only because of US policy of colluding with USSR to divide Korea. They should say the US committed holocaust against Koreans in bombings that went far beyond military objectives. Also, the US has been sexually colonizing Korea. More than 1/2 million Korean women have been taken so that their wombs can produce babies for white men, black men, Jewish men. The US attitude is "Your women are ours. They exist to have the babies of us superior men." And this mindset is now institutionalized among Koreans. Korean fathers take their daughters to the West and offer them to non-Korean men in exchange for bigger houses and cars. And Korean women, seeing their men as inferior, all dream of going to the West to produce babies for superior white, Jewish, or black men. Koreans are wanna-be-whites. Their minds have been colonized to hate and despise their own race. Korea is plastic surgery capital. It is trans-racial because Koreans hate being Asian and want to look white and want to have white-looking babies. Americans see South Korea as one big Saigon during the Vietnam War. Saigon was where US troops swaggered around as masters and colonized Vietnamese wombs by the 100,000s. And Vietnamese women went with American men as superior conquerors.
In the past, Koreans tried to maintain their identity, culture, and pride. All of that is gone. Koreans are now shameless in their transracial fantasies of being white or black. And Korean women would rather offer their wombs to Jewish men or white men than to their own men to produce Korean kids who will grow up to be patriots.
And Jewish men say Korean women put out to them because if they don't(and try to preserve their identity and ethnicity), they are like 'nazis'. "Your women are our women" is the motto of the American womb-colonizers. American men look upon Koreans the way Spanish Conquistador looked upon native women of South America. Wombs to colonize with 'superior seed'. Now, Jews would be pissed if Korean men treated Israeli-Jewish women the same way, but Jews feel that Koreans exist just to put out to Jews, whites, and blacks. Koreans and Korean-ness have no value and worth in and of themselves. They have value insofar as they're useful to Jews, whites, and blacks. And South Koreans, having gone global, now think and feel this way.
This race-mixing is billed as 'anti-racist', but it is totally about racial supremacism. Jewish, white, and black men expect Korean women to be 'easy' because they themselves feel superior in manhood to smaller Korean men. Also, the reason why so many Korean women go with non-Korean men is because they feel that men of other races are superior. It's no accident that the leading feminist group in South Korea mocks and ridicules Korean men for having smaller penises. This is the kind of thing that globalists push on Korea. Globalists encourage Korean women to become feminist and mock and reject Korean men for having smaller penises than other races. Just like globalists push Pussy Riot and homo-supremacism on Russia, it pushes this kind of anti-Korean vitriol on Korea in the guise of 'human rights' and 'justice'. Korean feminists are a disingenuous bunch. Their real reason for hating and despising Korean men is because they see Korean men as racially-sexually inferior to other men. So their real desire is to emigrate to find better men. Also, K-pop has made young Korean women extremely narcissistic, and they want the best of everything. Since they can't have the man of their dreams(seen in Hollywood movies), they cook up excuses to hate Korean men. They complain about 'inequality' but they are really obsessed about 'superiority'. They hate Korean men because they are seen as inferior by global standards.
Globalists know this, and this is why they push this kind of feminism on Korea. It divides Korean men from Korean women just like Korea was divided between north and south. Once, Korean women are divided from Korean men, it's even easier for Western men to take Korean women. Globalists find news way to play divide-and-conquer among Koreans. They divided Korea geographically, pitting north vs south. They pit Korean women against Korean men. They also pit Korean youths against Korean elders. Globalists encourage young Korean women to abandon social morals and act like Miley Cyrus, Lena Dunham, and Korean imitators of trashy globalist culture.
Also, the huge rise in Korean-American community means that globalists expect Korea to imitate Korean-America. What is Korean-America? It is about majority of Korean women rejecting Korean men as inferior and offering wombs to non-Korean men. It means Koreans imitating trashy American culture like tattoos and piercing. It means Koreans trying to act 'black' and favor black causes/identity over Asian ones. It means Koreans worshiping homosexuals since it's now the American Way. It means Koreans showing zero interest in real Korean history, culture, and etc. And it means Korean-Americans taking their brand of Korean-Americanism and pushing it on Korea. So, Korea should become a copy of Korean-American which is an imitative dog of globalist America controlled by Jews and homosexuals.

Koreans must be like Jews in one respect. They must define and shape their own narrative. Jews tell their own stories and insist on others to respect the Jewish narrative. So, the world sees history from the Jewish perspective.
In contrast, Koreans have not come up with their own narrative of Korean history. Instead, they rely on the US to control the Narrative. The US narratives morally favors the US, and it puts Korea at a moral disadvantage. It goes as follows: Evil imperialist Japan invaded and ruled over poor Korea. We Americans were shocked by Japanese aggression. So, we fought Japan and we liberated Korea. But Soviets took half. And later, evil communist North tried to invade the South, and we noble Americans saved the South from the evil north. And it is because of our protection that South Korea became a rich democracy. Also, US has allowed in lots of Korean immigration and Koreans have succeeded so much in the US, etc.

There is some truth to this narrative, but all narratives are selective and leave out crucial details.

A Korean counter-narrative must mention the following. US and UK arrived in East Asia as imperialists. They forced Asia open. When Japanese embarked on modernization and then took over parts of Asia, US and UK gave full approval. So, US was an imperialist power too in Asia. And if anything, Japan learned imperialism from the US and UK. Also, for most of Japanese colonialism in Korea, the US was mostly supportive and even heaped praise on Japan. The US-Japan clash was not about high-minded principles but about clash of empires. US won the war, but it had no real concern for Korea. If the US really cared, it would have insisted on Koreans deciding their own future once Japan was defeated. US offered no such hope to Koreans. Instead, US asked USSR to take Korea, and then decided to cut the nation in half. This laid the grounds for the Korean War, largely triggered by the US declaring that it won't lift a finger to defend South Korea. The war was a total catastrophe for Koreans. Millions of Koreans died just because US played superpower chess game with USSR.
Germany and Japan got smashed for their wars of aggression. In contrast, Korea got smashed even worse for no crime of its own. Also, neither South nor North got to choose its own leaders. Kim in North was imposed by Stalin. And Rhee in South was handpicked and imposed by the US. And US saw North Korea as convenient dumping grounds for all the surplus stockpiles of weapon from WWII. It was a huge boon the military-industrial complex built by FDR in WWII. As a result, countless Korean men, women, and children were killed by bomb blasts, shrapnel, and napalm.
This is what happened, but US pushes a narrative of itself a friendly and selfless defender of South Korea from evil communist North Korea. It's true that the Kim regime installed by Stalin was rotten. But was it wrong for Kim to want to unite Korea? Rhee wanted to invade the north and unite Korea too. Neither man was a saint, but both were patriotic enough to want a unified Korea. But they both fell into a trap. As puppets of superpowers, they failed to see that they were like two dogs of same family being goaded to slaughter one another.
It was from this catastrophe that the division of North and South became even more hardened.
And yet, the US pushes this bogus narrative of itself as a protecting angel of these poor helpless South Koreans. US actions led to the creation of North Korea, but US flatters itself as the defender of South Korea against North Korea. It's like a man setting a wolf loose to frighten people and then playing role of protector against the wolf. It's like a man setting fire to your house and then playing the role of hero to save you from the fire.

This is why it is up to Koreans to come up with their own narrative. It must begin with the fact that there was no liberation. Korea is still under occupation. True liberation comes only with unification of Korea and removal of US military occupation.

Now, it's true that North Korea has a rotten regime. So, it will take time for things to change. But the current tensions are most unnecessary and uncalled for. Keep in mind both Russia and China, former enemies of South Korea, have friendly ties with South Korea and with North Korea. It is the US that is holding out in making peace with North Korea because it wants to keep South Korea as a puppet. US fears that good relations between north and south will boost nationalism and undermine the globalist project of deracinating Koreans into globalists who are to be replaced by 'new Koreans' of massive immigration from other nations. (Globalism says 80% of Koreans should move to other nations and abandon Koreanness. As immigrants to other nations, these Koreans will just be imitation-whites, imitation-blacks, and etc. Generally, Korean-American girls will become imitation-whites while Korean-American boys, feeling deficient in manhood, will try to be 'cool' by acting like imitation-blacks. Some will become imitation-Jews and serve as intellectual servants of the Empire, like John Yoo and Harold Koh, servitors of empire as Darrell Hamamoto might characterize them.)

As for North Korea's 'belligerency', it is merely a reaction to the US acting like a rogue nation at the behest of Jewish Zionists. The US war machine has been waging Wars for Israel since the Gulf War. Its Occupation of Saudi Arabia led to blowback of 9/11, and then the US cooked up more reasons, mostly lies, to destroy Iraq and Libya. US makes much noise about 'human rights' but works with abysmal Saudi Arabia to arm and fund Jihadi terrorists in Syria in a war that cost 400,000 people. Thomas Friedman of NYT says US should let ISIS destroy and undermine secular modernizer Assad. And speaking of human rights, US says nothing about the ongoing theft of land in West Bank by Zionists. US praises Israel no matter how what Israel does. US also says nothing about 300 nuclear warheads in Israel. But, at the behest of Jews, it throws crazy tantrums about Iran, a nation with no nuclear bombs. US is totally hypocritical, indeed sociopathic.
Also, the ONLY reason why the US is concerned with North Korean missiles and nukes is because North Korea has ties with Iran and other 'enemies of Israel'. So, it's a Jewish thing. It's true North Korea is a terrible place for human rights, but then, so is Saudi Arabia, but US is silent about Saudi abuses despite the fact that 9/11 was carried out by terrorists radicalized by Saudis. Also, Zionists created Israel by ethnically cleansing 700,000 Palestinians, but Americans don't give a shit about that massive abuse of human rights. So, 'human rights' is just something that the US weaponizes and employs selectively to push certain agendas. It was the same in the past. When US and Japan had friendly relations prior to WWII, the US never complained about Japanese imperialism in Korea and Manchuria. If anything, there was much praise for Japanese role in Korea. Back then, the US narrative was "honorary-white-Japanese are civilizing those barbaric Koreans." Today, the US has a similar narrative: "Jewish Zionists have a right to rule over those savage barbarian Palestinian 'muzzies'."

Anyway, we know North Korea got its nukes because of US aggression and belligerency. As US cooked up lies to invade Iraq, it called out North Korea as 'axis of evil'. US meant North Korea, along with Iran, could be next. Naturally, North Korea sped up its nuclear program. People thought Obama would be better than Bush, but he manufactured lies to destroy Libya despite the fact that Gaddafi had made peace with the West. All the more reason for North Korea to be alarmed and find ways to defend itself. (Furthermore, given US holocaust in North Koreans in the Korean War, another US mass killing of North Koreans would be impossible to stomach. It'd be like Germans killing millions of more Jews.) US also fomented a coup in Ukraine and even worked with Neo-Nazis to topple the Kiev government. And US also indirectly aided ISIS and Alqaeda in Syria. Meanwhile in South Korea, US insisted on US and SK carrying out joint exercises preparing for possible invasion of North Korea. Is it any wonder that the NK regime grew even more paranoid and recalcitrant? But the US ignores all these facts and pretends to be the good guy at odds with North Korea as 'rogue nation'. What chutzpah.

But the most pathetic thing is that South Korean elites and Korean-American elites are both totally silent about this. They never come up with their OWN NARRATIVE on the Korean War and its aftermath. They don't speak out against US aggression and war crimes that made North Korean regime even more hostile. No, they just look over their shoulders at the US as their master. And they just go along with the Narrative cooked up by the US that is now controlled by Zionists whose Wars for Israel in the Middle East have destroyed so many lives.

In a way, what the US is doing in the Middle East today is as loathsome as what it did to Korea.
Back in 1945, the US created the very conditions that led to division of Korea and the terrible war. But US denied all moral responsibility and only portrayed itself as noble defender of South Korea. The white knight protecting the Korean damsel in distress who, for the favors of Uncle Sam, should offer her vagina and womb to America.
In today's Middle East, most of the recent chaos are the result of US meddling, war-mongering, bombings, and invasions. But US ignores its acts of aggression and plays the role of 'humanitarian' by pretending to care about 'refugees'. But why do those refugees exist in the first place? Because of US strategy in the Middle East as devised by Zionists. US destroys an entire world, creates lots of refugees, and then pretends to care for those refugees. US doesn't apologize for having created the refugees in the first place.

As long as Koreans remain dog-like and servile in their mentality, they will never forge their own narrative, their own story, and their own perspective. They will always rely on others. Its mindset will be that of dog of the US. It will feel morally inferior and indebted to the US instead of having the moral courage to speak the truth to the US and make demands.
As long as Koreans have dog-like mentality, they will just follow and imitate the US way without any critical faculty. It will act on the premise that everything in the US is better and that Korea exists only to be judged, criticized, and pressured to imitate the US in every way.

So, the question remains... Do Koreans want to be truly free, independent, autonomous, and create their own Narrative... or do Koreans want to be imitative, slavish, and obedient and follow the US narrative and ideology on everything?

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Another Asian complaint sounds like Dean Van Nguyen bullshit

This article reads like the Irish Nguyen stuff about how Irish aren’t ‘racist’ against Asians but still are against blacks.
But this is a double-edged sword.
It is true that whites notice blackness more than yellowness. White feel more threatened by blackness. But also more fascinated and excited by blackness. So, there is more loathing but also more admiration, esp in sports, music, and sex.
In contrast, Asians are ‘invisible’. Whites see Asian-ness as a nonentity. Given the two Seoul Brothers, Brothas Jay and Alvin who posture as honorary egg-Negrolls, it seems even Asians find Asian-ness too bland and dorky for identity. The fact that so many Asians get plastic surgeries(to look white) and ape rappers(to seem black and cool) would indicate that they too have no use for Asian-ness as an identity.
So, in a way, greater white acceptance of yellowness as an invisibility could be seen as a different kind of ‘racism’. A ‘racism’ of indifference and benign neglect.
It’s like humans will notice bears and wolves more than rabbits and pigeons. So, one could argue they are more wary of such predatory animals. Meanwhile, they are more accepting of pigeons and rabbits in human habitats. BUT, one could argue that humans also notice wolves and bears more due to greater fascination as out of fear. Sure, humans fear being mauled by bears or attacked by wolves, but they also respect the power of such animals. In contrast, humans hardly even notice pigeons and rabbits.
The Irish case with Nguyen was instructive. It didn’t occur to the moron that, in some ways, the Irish are more admiring of Negroes than of Nguyens of the world. Indeed, the same could be said of Nguyen himself. How many Irish are interested in Vietnamese history, culture, music, sports, sex(unless it’s some me-so-horny whore in Saigon)? But plenty of Irish are into black sports and music. And some Irish women are into jungle fever. Indeed, judging by Nguyen’s own culture page, it seems 90% of his interest is rap and black culture. So, the Irish NOTICE blackness as something dangerous but also admirable, indeed admirable because of its danger quotient. In contrast, Irish accept Nguyen with yawning boredom because his dorky half-yellow butt is so dull and non-threatening.
Also, what we need is true race-ism, what I believe in, in order to understand reality.
Race means race, ism means belief, and race + ism should mean belief in races and racial differences. And the fact is EVERYONE IS REALLY A RACE-IST since they notice race and racial differences all the time. Never mind what they say or consciously claim to believe due to PC training. The fact is they see race and racial differences in sports, music, streets, schools, neighborhoods, buses, sex industry, music, crime, and choice of mates. When a white woman goes off with a Negro, she is noticing the big negro. When a yellow woman goes off with white guy, she sees something superior to yellow geek. When whites listen to black music but blacks ignore white music, it means black music has more Power content. Is it any wonder that both whites and blacks have no use for yellow music? As Rock and Pop is all about instant-power, volume and intensity matter.
And as David Cole said in a Taki column, lots of white people and Jews in Los Angeles prefer Mexicans(even illegal ones) to blacks because browns are smaller and commit less crime than big black thugs. They notice race.
We see Jews dominant in brainy endeavors. We see blacks dominant in brawny endeavors. We see black bullying dominant in schools.
And gentrification.. how can that not be about race?
Is America race-ist? Yes. How can it not be race-ist when there are different races with racial differences that lead to different attitudes and behaviors?
Also, Jeff Guo’s article only validates just another race-ist fact. Yellows tend to be servile, slavish, and unoriginal. And Guo’s piece is just one more PC tripe. It doesn’t expand the Narrative and certainly doesn’t challenge it. It’s the same crap. Yellows are such teachers pets who spew out the same crap drummed into their heads by professors and media overlords. This is why Asians entering journalism is terrible. As loyal servile dogs of PC, they will just bark according to command. Even as Asians bitch about ‘white racism’, all their ideas were put inside their skulls by white proggy professors.
Everyone is a race-ist. The only difference is there are honest candid race-ists such as myself and disingenuous race-ists like most other people.
In everything that people do — school, walking the streets, searching for sexual mates, and etc. — , there is a racial factor. People notice racial differences because they exist and are so obvious.
Now, media can affect people’s views, but reality eventually comes around to disabuse of us our illusions. TV and movies present most street thugs as white, but most Americans know that blacks are more likely to be thugs. I mean it is so obvious.
While there is the Asian geek stereotype, there is also the Asian martial arts kung fu mofo stereotype, and this ‘chinaman’ can whup 100 guys at once.
There are tons of these movies, and Bruce Lee is one of the most famous icon. So is Jackie Chan. But based on school and street experience, most Americans don’t see Asians are invincible badass warriors. In reality, most Americans know Asians are not kung fu supermen.
Btw, as long as these yellows keep bitching about white nations, do they ever ask themselves why they left their ancestral lands behind forever to come to live in the West? And why didn’t they choose non-white nations for destinations? Why were white nations their favored destinations? Isn’t that ‘racist’?
And if Asian-ness is so important to them, why bring their kids to a place where their kids will lose language, lose identities, lose connection to their own peoples, have their kids(especially daughters) intermarry, and etc?
Why do they bitch so much about what whites think about them when they must have pretty low opinions of their own kind to have left their homelands forever, abandoned their own identities, and hopefully marry with whites and have white-looking kids.
One thing for sure… blacks were brought here by force. And American Indians were invaded by force. But Asians were not forced to come to white nations. They chose to flee their own kind. They rejected their own kind. They fled from their peoples and decided to say good bye to their tombs of their ancestors. They gave up their own cultures. They offered their kids to foreigners for marriage.
So, why are they bitching about white attitudes about them when they don’t seem to even care for their own people and culture?
As for the Model Minority thing, it’s an excuse trotted out over and over.
The fact is it never mattered.
The reason why Asians made rapid progress after WWII is because US became a rich nation. When people do better, they become more generous. Things were tough for most whites for most of US history even if US was a richer nation than most. Most Americans were not middle class until after WWII when a huge boom happened.
As whites got richer, they just became mellower and nice. Full stomachs, freedom, and opportunities do that to a people. That’s why Civil Rights movement happened during the boom yrs. And since there was more for everyone in a full employment economy, Asians find their footing too during this time.
Also, model minority cult or not, Asian norms were simply different from those of other groups. Why should this surprise us? All groups are different. Even among whites, Italian-Americans acted differently from Irish Americans who were different from Jewish Americans and Swedish-Americans. Even if the model minority thing had never existed, the results would have been the same.
Asian Norm just isn’t very intense and threatening because they are a smaller people, less loud in voice, and less crazy in style. Indeed, even if Asians decided to act angry and put on Yellow Lives Matter protest, most people would be bored because they find Asians not very threatening or exciting.
The funny thing is, even when Asians protest the ‘model minority’ cult, they do in such a Model Minority way. They remain well-mannered and act like they wanna discuss this issue over tea than act crazy and riot like Negroes and burn down cities. “Model minority idear no good. Chinese people not all hard working. Some lazy and stupid. Lookie out window. That guy have tattoo. He no go good college.” Yeah, sure.
Another thing. This ‘model minority’ cult is now kept alive by Asians. I haven’t seen or heard a white person mention Asian Model Minority in ages.
If anything, given the current trashy culture, blacks are seen as the New Model Minority cuz they can rap, dance, do sports, and hump everything in sight.
Given that the New Morality is all about Victimhood, Blacks and whichever group that is most vocal in bitching(esp homos) and howling is considered the Most Model. Notice Trump bashes China, the land of industrious folks, but praises the Loud and Fearsome Negro.
So, this Asian bitching about ‘Model Minority’ seems to be about their envy and resentment that they are not considered as part of the New Model Minority that favors blacks above other people.
Asians may think this has to do with MLK and Civil Rights, and it does to some extent.
But it’s really because reality is race-ist.
As Sailer wrote in Plaques for Blacks, the white fascination and preference for blacks is racial. After all, American Indians, racial cousins of Asians, have a very compelling narrative of defeat and oppression, but whites no longer care about them — though, once in awhile, they make feel good-movies like DANCES WITH WOLVES(apparently because even wolves dance better than Indians).
Asians get no respect because they are racially not as threatening as blacks are. That is the paradox of American moral politics. Whites fear blacks more, but the fear factor also fuels the greater fascination and admiration. Blacks dominate the streets as thugs but also the sports fields as heroes and gods to cucked out whites.
“In contrast, white Americans used to take the complaints of American Indians more seriously. And indeed, Indians have much to legitimately gripe about regarding life on reservations such as Pine Ridge. But in recent years, as whites have become ever more amused by blacks, white concern for Indians has diminished. Native Americans, with their plodding dance rhythms, athletic stiffness, and lack of a gift of gab, have increasingly vanished from American consciousness. They now appear to strike whites less as noble and tragic than as depressing and tedious compared with those always entertaining blacks.”
It’s like what the black guy says to Archie Bunker in this scene: “It’s all medicine.”
When it comes to social reality, it is all race, and when one notices races, it is all race-ism. The question is, are you are a honest race-ist or true race-ist or a dishonest or disingenuous racist like most people?

Tuesday, April 4, 2017

Lack of Honest Discussion on Korea still dog us in dealing with Korean Crisis

This issue could be resolved much faster if some sensible and conscientious South Koreans and Korean-Americans(and other diaspora Koreans) stepped up to the plate to speak some plain truth.

We can't expect the truth from North Korea, a nation of lies, wrapped in a lie, in a lie.
North Korean Narrative is that the Great Kim liberated Korea from the Japanese but evil American Imperialists got in the way. There is precious little talk of Soviet role in establishing the Kim regime or China's role in bailing out North Korea in the Korean War.
North Korea isn't about nationalism or patriotism. It is about dynasticism of the gross Kims, and any amount of lies will be spun to keep Kims in power.

We can't expect much truth in the US. While there are American scholars who know the historical truth, they have no emotional investment in popularizing it. They just see Korea as a pawn in the game between Japan and China. They are not pro-Korean in the way that Jewish scholars are pro-Zionist. Their main interest in Korea is political and strategic, not national, historical, or cultural. Also, many scholars are little more than shills and hacks for the System caught up in the Global Game. Korea is a pawn, nothing more, just like all the other small nations are pawns and puppets.

As for the US government, they fear the true narrative as much as North Korea does. Neither side wants to admit that North Korea is the product of US foreign policy that requested Soviet entry into North Asia. According to US textbooks and narrative, the division of Korea was just an unfortunate accident of WWII coming to a close... like in Eastern Europe. But this is false. It's true that there was little US could do to save Eastern Europe from the Soviet juggernaut.
But Soviets entered North Asia only because of the request of Americans who could have made it clear that either Soviets take all of Korea or none of it so that Americans will do the job.

FDR's position was for Stalin to take all of Korea. Full stalinization of Korea would have been dire, but it would have led to a united country and there would have been no Korean War that killed millions and divided countless families and still remains a scar.
But after FDR died, Truman went for something terrible. Instead of letting Soviets have all of it or demanding US will deal with all of Korea, US decided to divide up Korean with USSR, thus setting the grounds for all the real war and cold war and other headaches to come. From a political viewpoint, it's terrible enough. From a human cost, it was catastrophic.
But since South Korea is such a compliant ally and good whore, the US wants to maintain the narrative of itself as the Leader of the Free World defending southern half of Korea from the evil of communist tyranny... even though Soviets entered Korea and installed the Kim regime only because the US wanted Soviets to deal with the Japanese. (In retrospect, it would have made more sense for US to arm the Chinese troops and use their manpower to take on the Japanese who were cut off from supplies and on the ropes. But that would have led to a united and empowered China under KMT. Perhaps, even if unconsciously, the West felt it was advantageous to divide Asian nations in half to keep them less powerful. This was done not only to Korea and Vietnam but to China itself. Maybe Americans thought China would remain forever divided between Mao's north and Chiang's South. But Mao had the wherewithal to unite the big country and give aid to Korea and Vietnam to try to do the same. A united nation is more powerful. Yet, ironically, the economic model that led to rise of Asia came from US satellites like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore. History is funny that way. United China and united Vietnam made progress by imitating the satellite puppets of America. Still, their unity gives them long-term stability and power, whereas Korea still aches from the division.)

Anyway, in order to deal with the Korean problem, we need a new narrative, which really do matter as they define the moral balance of parties involved. After all, the Narrative defines white-black relations in America. Whites act the way they do(at a moral disadvantage) because of the history of discrimination. And Jews get a break because of the history of antisemitism. To be sure, there is no single valid narrative. There is also the narrative of bad black behavior that needs to be told. And there is also the narrative of Jewish Abuse of Power that also needs to be addressed. Anyway, narratives do define the present.
In Korea, the current narrative is totally useless since it's filled with lies.
Only a proper narrative can lead to a better understanding and sensible solutions.

First, we must do away with the false narrative of US as noble savior and defender of Korea. US and UK first forced Japan open, and when Japan was willing to join the imperialist game, US and UK tolerated and even endorsed Japan's takeover of Northeast Asia that included Korea. US and UK saw this as a check on Russian power. And they felt flattered that a non-white power was learning from the West and spreading modernization to other benighted lands. (As imperialism does lead to development and improvement in many areas, there was some validity to this.) Japan was okay with US takeover of Philippines, and US reciprocated with Japan's takeover of Korea. There was no American sympathy for Koreans whatsoever except among some Christian missionaries who, however, were willing to work under Japanese colonialism to spread the Gospel. Indeed, even the Christian missionaries saw Japanese rule over Korea as a good thing since Japanese tolerated and allowed some degree of proselytizing, at least until US-Japan relations got really sour. On the other hand, Christian missionaries also gave protection and moral support to many independence activists.

US suddenly took on the role of defender of Asia when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. This role was as odd as the one played by the Japanese. Japanese posed as defenders of Asian brethren while ruthlessly crushing, raping, and pillaging them. Americans posed as saviors of Asian victims of evil Japanese while playing up every anti-Asian stereotype in relation to the Japanese. As most Americans couldn't tell a 'Jap' from a 'gook' from a 'chink', the dehumanization of the Japanese only led to American contempt for other Asians after the war. "They all looked alike" after all, and all ate rice. Unsurprisingly, US policy went from "save a noble Chinaman from the evil Jap" to "Save the polite Japanese from the savage Commie Chink". And save the gooks from the chinks too -- or save the good gooks under Christian Rhee from the bad gooks under Soviet Kim -- , but who can tell which is which, so drop all the bombs left over from WWII on North Korea and let God sort it out.

Yes, US did defend South from the North and eventually China, but US policy created a divided Korea. And US policy played a big part in setting the grounds for the Korean War, especially by signaling that it would not defend South from an attack by the North, which emboldened Stalin, Mao, and Kim. Also, even though war is hell and all sides commit horrors, US bombing of North Korea has to go down as one of the great war crimes of the century. Just how do you drop more bombs on that backward nation than on great industrial powers during WWII? And mostly on civilians?

Historical apologies are useless(and often self-serving) and reparations lead to moral corruption(as with Jews forever demanding free stuff and South Koreans cooking up more excuses to squeeze the Japanese), but acknowledging history is necessary for truth and better policy. And there are too many lies on the Korean issue.

North Korea doesn't want to admit it exists only because of US policy. And if US has anything in common with North Korea, it is on this very matter. US doesn't want to take responsibility as the key player that led to the division of the North that was unnecessary and could have been avoided with better and more insistent US negotiations with Soviets.

Since North Korea and US don't want to deal with the truth, it is left to South Korea, a democracy where people can talk more freely. But even there, the knee-jerk anti-communist pro-American rightists have imposed laws that silence anyone who threatens the Narrative of the US as sacred defender and holy ally of the South against the evil North. There is a reason for this. Due to rightist collaboration with Japanese during colonization, a new Korea would have been led by leftists(if not necessarily communists) who'd resisted the Japanese. As US feared communist takeover, it protected the collaborationist class and put them in seats of power, and these quisling-vichy-ites owe their power and privilege to US protection. Now, it may well be that their rule was actually better for Korea as leftists tend to mess things up economically. But from a historical moral viewpoint, it was an injustice. But as whores who gained everything under US power and protection, this class of people who are still influential in Korea are adamant about invoking National Security to silence or ban anyone who is deemed admiring of North Korea and overly critical of US-Korea ties.

The anti-American forces in South Korea used to be on the Left, but with the total fall of communism and Marxism, the Korean left has degenerated much like the left everywhere. It is now all about homosexual politics and Diversity, thus little more than shills for the globalist enterprise. If the Korean Right is a puppet of the Pentagon, the Korean Left is puppet of Harvard University and MTV. Both are equally worthless. Sort of like the bogus neocon 'right' in the US and the bogus 'left' in the West that both whore out to Globalism but never defend the nation or the native working masses.

So, if North Korea, the US, and even South Korea are unwilling to speak the truth, then who will? Korean-Americans? But most of these shallow clowns are into tattoo, rap culture, bling, and hedonism(if less educated) OR political correctness, homo adoration, and status approval(if more educated). It's been said that having children makes a family more conservative, but this can make it more PC as well. Parents want to protect their kids. One way to protect kids is to ensure their success. So, Asian parents tell their kids to conform to anything associated with power and privilege to gain success. And since PC rules, these kids become the biggest PC morons in the world. Is it any wonder that Asian Americans are among the most 'progressive' robots in America mouthing the same gibberish fed to them by their teachers? As Asian parents lack intellectual interest, they don't care what they kids believe as long as they 'succeed' and gain 'status'.

Since success and privilege matter most to Korean-Americans, they will whore out to the Narrative of noble US as leader of free world defending damsel in distress South from the Big Bad Wolf of the North. Korean-Americans in universities and government trot this BS line to win position and place to show off their status when, in fact, they are nothing but collaborationist whores of globalism. Unlike Jewish intellectuals who showed some guts and chutzpah in forging a Narrative that challenged that of the Wasps, Korean-Americans, like all Asian-Americans, just learn by rote the Narrative taught to them by the ruling institutions.
These Asian-Americans may flatter themselves are 'free thinkers' because they are 'progressive', but the pissant clowns are blind to the fact that PC shuts many more doors of inquiry than opens them. Besides, the main priority of most Asian-American 'progressives' is to spread 'gay marriage' in Asia so that they will win doggy approval from their Western peers. Your average Korean-American 'progressive' is too busy condemning South Korea for not being pro-gay and pro-diversity enough to realize that such are essentially globalist tools of neo-imperialism to weaken every nation.

Since US has a specific goal for South Korea and since Korean-Americans are just status-seeking whores and dogs, they will not play the role of speaker of truth to power. Korean-American parents would be awful proud to see their kids graduate from West Point. They don't care if US wages war on North Korea over some bogus issue and make Korean-Americans in the military kill other Koreans.
Now, suppose US were to come under control by Palestinian-Americans who make Israel out to be the worst rogue nation on Earth. And suppose these warmongering Palestinian elites cook up excuses to wage war on Israel. How many Jewish-Americans would gladly kill fellow Jews in the name of 'human rights' and punishing 'rogue' Israel? Not many. But these uncle tom Koreans will do anything to seek approval from whomever they consider to be superior.

Now, is North Korea a 'rogue' nation? No. It is a pitiful nation ruled by a vile regime. But what is rogue about it? Yes, it has engaged in terrorism and various criminal enterprises, but then, so have Saudi Arabia and Israel and Nigeria. Why don't US call them rogue nations? There are tons of illegal activity coming out of Israel. North Korea specializes in US current counterfeiting, but Israel is tops in many organized criminal activities all around the world, including white slavery.
Also, what nation has North Korea attacked? It only tried to unite with the South in the Korean War, but this was no different than any divided nation trying tore unite. It isn't an invasion when you try to unite your nation. Yes, Kim was a bad guy and Stalinism sucks, but there was nothing wrong in one bunch of Koreans trying to unite with another bunch. What other nations did North Korea try to invade? Iran too has been a peaceful nation, but it is categorized as 'rogue'. In contrast, US supported Iraq's attack on Iran and even its use of poison gas in the 1980s. US also cooked up lies and destroyed one nation after another in the Middle East. And it increased tensions to dangerous levels in Europe over Russia when the Cold War is long over. So, even if North Korea is a vile nation -- yes it is -- , it hasn't posed any threat to the world whereas the US has been a curse around the world since the end of the Cold War. While the vile Kim regime should be torn to pieces by dogs and its people for its tyrannical ways, North Korea's place in the world has been downright sober and responsible compared to that of the US that is controlled by vile and vicious Zionists who will sacrifice any number of gentiles to further their tribal interests.

Seriously, is North Korea a threat to China, Russia, Japan, or the US? It is maybe a threat to South Korea, but then, if South Korea still cannot defend itself from the impoverished north with 1/40th its economy and less than 1/2 its population, it deserves to be invaded. What a bunch of cowards.How much richer do South Koreans have to be in order to defend themselves from a starving peasant economy? And if South Korea is really under such threat. why are all these lousy Koreans moving to America while expecting American boys to do the dying for them? Not a single American should give his life for these lowlife cowards and wussies.

True, North Korea acts belligerent in 'gangsta' manner. It goes for huff-and-puff antics. Part of it is for domestic propaganda purposes, the myth that North Korea is a great power. It's all clown-act, nothing to take seriously. But there are real reasons why North Korea needs nuclear weapons, and it is because US is a truly a rogue nation that will cook up any lies to destroy anything to appease the Zionists. It was the US, under Neocon pressure, that undid and unraveled all possible rapprochement between US and North Korea. Zionists hate the fact that North might trade nuclear secrets with Arab or Muslim nations. Never mind Israel's own huge arsenal. Jews will say Israel deserves to defend itself because it is a democracy. Okay, Israel is a much better place for Jews than North Korea is for North Koreans, but the moral dynamics are far more complicated. Israel is a much nicer place --- even for Arabs there --- , but Israel was founded through ethnic cleansing and imperialism whereas North Koreans are just natives living on their own land. They stole nothing from no one, and their one big 'crime' was trying to unite the nation once again --- the same dream held by leaders of the south. So, from a historical viewpoint, Israel is worse than North Korea because even though Israel is democratic and more humane as a political system, it was founded by taking land from another people and, furthermore, still continues to occupy them. North Korea, as miserable as it is, only rules over its own territory and own people. And there is no indication that North Korea has aims on any other nation. I mean seriously, is North gonna invade China, Russia, or Japan? If it could, it would take the South, but the North is now in defensive mode. It talks big and tough out of fear, especially after the US cooked up total nonsense to destroy one nation after another at the behest of Zionists and the military industrial complex.
And why do Jews care so much about North Korea? Because they care so much about human rights and the plight of the poor? Really? These same Zionists who said it was worth it to allow 500,000 Iraqi children to die of malnutrition? These same Zionists who turn a blind eye to massacres in Gaza? These same Zionists who work with Saudis to fund and aid Jihadis who've turned entire areas of Syria into hell on earth? These same Zionists who raped Russia and left millions of destitute Russians to die of cold and sickness? These same Zionists who work with neo-Nazis in Ukraine to tear that nation apart?
No, the ONLY reason why Zionists are interested in North Korea is because they don't want it share technology with nations disliked by Israel. According to Zionist supremacists, ONLY Israel has the right to have WMD to defend itself. Other nations should be defenseless and be easy pickings IF the Zionist-controlled US decides to give thumbs down to them.

Also, as rotten as the North Korean regime and statist-run economy are, the reason for dire economics of North Korea cannot be blamed on N. Korea alone. It's the sanctions. If South Korea were hit with the same sanctions, it would suffer greatly also despite having a market economy. If Israel were hit with the same kinds of sanctions --- for Nakba or nuclear weapons or Occupation or any number of reasons --- , it too would lead to mass poverty and starvation.

Now, what has been the main reason for the sanctions? North Korea has a nuclear program and may have nukes. Well, if that is so bad, why not go after Israel? And why shouldn't North Korea have nukes when the US invaded and destroyed nations without nukes? If Poles in 1939 could have had nukes, it should have. Imagine Hitler complaining that Poles should get rid of them so Germans could invade more easily.

US foreign policy has demonstrated itself to be rogue and criminal after the Cold War. It is sick, demented, and criminal. While Kim regime is vile and nutty --- like Gaddafi --- , any regime wants to survive at the very least. And given US actions and the worthlessness of US promises, it is totally rational for North Korea to have nukes and as many of them as possible. And given all the innocent North Korean civilians that the US killed in the war without ever acknowledging this great crime, the US has no right to start another war and kill more people there. That would rather be like Germans killing more Jews and Japanese killing more Chinese in Nanking.
The only reason for having war with North Korea is IF North Korea attacks first. Now, the only place North might attack is the South, but the North knows this is not doable. For one thing, the South is too advanced and has much better military arsenal. Also, neither Russia or China will side with the North if the North were to attack. They will join the international community in condemning North Korea. Thus isolated, the North will be able to sustain the war for just a few weeks. And then, it will be defeated and wiped off the map.

So, it is time to drop the charade about the Northern Threat. It is time to see North trash-talking for what it is: braggadocio of a clown.

What can be done is to call for end of hostilities at the official level. End all sanctions. Let North develop its own economy in its own way and develop closer ties with the South and then gradually work towards reunification. And let US troops move out of the South, and let Koreans fix their own problems and finally grow up than remain children clinging to Uncle Sam.

But for this to happen, we need a New Narrative based on the truth. Now, given that the North is ruled by repressive regime, we can't expect much truth from them.
But as US, South Korea, and Korean-Americans have sufficient freedom to speak the truth, they need to go back to the historical origins of how the Division came about. US need not apologize but merely acknowledge that its policy led to a undeserved 'punishment' of a nation that had nothing to do with Pearl Harbor. If anything, Japan should have been divided like Germany after WWII.
But then, there are those in the US who don't want a united Korea because it means US might have to leave the peninsula, its only military beachhead on the Asian continent. Also, US values South Korea as its hard-working, slavish, blow-jobbing whore. A united Korea might stop acting like such a total dog and whore and work on nationalism than 'gay rights' and 'diversity' to develop a united nation. US globalists seek a borderless world and that means turning South Korea into Puerto Rico.

As long as US has the moral upperhand over South Koreans and Korean-Americans --- who are shameless globalist whores and quislings --- , US interests(currently dominated by vicious Zionists) will dominate Korean affairs.
The current Narrative morally favors America as a generous and selfless defender of helpless South Koreans from the rabid North Korean wolf. South Korea is little red-riding-hood who needs US as the hunter against the evil wolf North Korea.

But in fact, US interests since end of the Cold War have been detrimental to Korea.

It is natural that Korea eventually return to the Chinese orbit. That's been the case for 1000s of yrs. US entered the scene because of power vacuum caused by one crisis after another and then the Cold War. US has to eventually move out of the Pacific Asia. It is only right, as the Pacific West isn't controlled by the Chinese or Japanese military. Why should Asian Pacific be forever the lake of US armed forces?
Now, Koreans surely got a lot out of the 20th century because they were torn from the Chinese orbit. As China has become stagnant and rotten, Korea had more to gain from Japanese rule in the first half of 20th century. And in the second half, there was an interesting political experiment of two Koreans under two different systems, with history proving the Anglo-capitalist-democratic system to be superior(as long as it manages to remain free of the claws of globalist Zionists who have ruined the American experiment).
But China modernized and turning into great power once again, it is time for smaller Asian nations to grow closer to China, and US should respect this, and phase out a withdrawal in stead of keeping playing these ridiculous pivot games that only increase tensions.

US has a great future with trade with Latin America(though immigration should be strictly controlled). Indeed, all of North America and South America can prosper greatly all on their own without Asia, Europe, and Africa if they do things right. US should not waste resources on endless Wars for Israel, some dumb 'new cold war' with Russia, and whatever, mostly to appease the sick supremacism of Zionist globalists. Thankfully, there is a vocal Jewish community developing in its criticism of the total bankruptcy of the Zionists who've turned both political parties of dung-heaps.

In a fantasy scenario, if the idiot child Kim of North Korea could swallow a truth-and-integrity pill, he could speak the truth and work toward a saner future.
Imagine if this clown stopped acting da gangsta like Gaddafi and talked soberly about the problems between North and the US. Suppose he were to appear before a foreign press and calmly express why his nation needs nukes because US has been a rogue state. Imagine if he could accept the fact that North Korea is the product of US foreign policy, and that fact should be acknowledged in new relations between US and Korea.
People would listen around the world and show some sympathy. But fat-boy is an intellectual zero, spent his time in Europe stuffing his mouth with cheese and stuffing his ears with Michael Jackson. He thinks like a celebrity and wants to play gansta. Great irony of fat Kim is that he is so impossible because he swallowed too much vain Western Pop culture.
Korean parenting surely sucks. If it's not the Nut Rage, it's the Kimpossible.

Let the stupid Koreans go their own way finally, and American can focus on building ties between North and South America for the New World Future.

I think, at this point, the bulk of the blame must go to the US.

Why? Consider the three sovereign powers that have some influence on the Koreas: China, the US, and Russia. (Japan is a major economic power but has no political independence as it is a whore of the US. )

What is China’s position on the Koreas? It is willing to deal with both North and South. It is not opposed to peace between the two Koreas and eventual reunification. China doesn’t favor North against the South. It would be happy to see the Korean problem resolved.

What is Russia’s position on the Koreas? Russia, as core of USSR, once held great sway over North Korea. After all, Stalin installed the Kim regime. But Russia’s view is that Cold War is long over. It has no direct interest in the Koreas. It is happy to deal with both North and South. It will gladly do business with both and not meddle in their internal affairs. Like China, Russia has peaceful relations with both North and South, and it doesn’t care if North and South were to embark upon peaceful means of reunification.

In contrast, what is America’s position on the Koreas?

It refuses to deal with the North. It keeps on making BS demands on the North even though no sane government should trust the US that has a long record of destabilizing and destroying other nations since the end of the Cold War. US has been the main nation-wrecker around the world. US has done this with sanctions, ‘color revolutions’, subversion, aiding Jihadis with air campaign(as in Libya and Syria), and outright invasions. And the driving force behind the US agenda has been Zionist supremacism. Whatever enriches and ensures greater Jewish power counts as ‘American Interest’. Whatever threatens Jewish supremacy is seen as against ‘Western Values’. Jews get away with this rot because they control the Media and Academic Narrative in the West.

Neither North Korea nor South Korea has anything to fear from Russia or China. Russia only wants diplomatic relations and business with the two Koreas. China has a closer relation with North, but it actually does far more business with the South.
If China-South Korea relations have been strained in recent years, it is due to US provocation of North Korea as pretext to plant more missiles in South Korea, ostensibly to defend South from North but really meant to target China.
Of course, US knows this will sour relations between China and S. Korea, but that is precisely what it wants. And S. Korea knows this will upset China, and S. Korea doesn’t want to go along with this, but it has to do so since it is the whore-dog-puppet of the US. Thus, the US drives a wedge between S. Korea(its whore) and China by provoking tensions between the South and North.

Let’s be realistic. North is ruled by a rotten regime, but it is no threat to anyone. The North throws tantrums because it is a cornered animal. It is the US that insists on more joint War Exercises with the South. These ‘exercises’ are openly promoted as practice-runs of how US and South will invade the North. Why wouldn’t the North not panic and throw fits? In some ways, the US is all too happy that North has a nuke project because that can be invoked to justify US hostilities in the peninsula forever, just like Jews always bitch about Iran’s nuclear plan — even though Israel has all the nukes and violates all international nuclear inspection agreements — to justify more interventions and provocations in the Middle East. That way, South is pressured to go along with US with these ‘training exercises’ that threaten the North. The North freaks out and makes belligerent noises. And then, the US invokes to North ‘craziness’ to scare-monger the world that Mad Kim is building the Doomsday Machine to blow up the world. This is 007 fantasy nonsense.

Zionists control US foreign policy, and these sociopaths couldn’t care less about gentiles in Russia, China, Korea, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Ukraine, and etc. Since the US is the Pawnshop Jewel of Jewish power — like India was the Crown Jewel of the British Empire — , Jews use American Power to manipulate and mess up global affairs any which way to further their own tribal interests.

In a perfect world, no nation would have nukes. And especially a nation ruled by shi*s like North Korea shouldn’t have nukes. But every regime wants to survive, and nothing is more rational than North Korea’s nuclear program since the US has destroyed so many nations without proper WMDs to defend themselves. Indeed, when the US wants to destroy a nation, it accuses the nation of having fantasy WMD’s to destroy it. Iraq. Or, even when a nation gives up its WMD’s, as Libya did, the US will cook up fantasy ‘atrocities’ to destroy that nation. The US isn’t ruled by Americans, most of whom are decent folks who mean harm to no one. It isn’t ruled by average Jews, who also mean no harm to anyone. It is ruled by Jewish Globalist Elites who are the New Nazis. They are mean, nasty, vicious, and vile. They are cold-blooded like Madeline Albright who yawns at 500,000 dead Iraqi kids. They denounce ‘white supremacism’ but use their power to force all US politicians to shout Hail Zionism at AIPAC Nuremberg Rallies. After all, supremacism cannot tolerate other ‘supremacism’. According to Jewish logic, the mere desire of a white European nation to preserve its race, culture, and territory is ‘far right’, ‘supremacist’, and ‘hateful’. But these very whites are forced to shout Hail Israel as a Jewish state.

Anyway, China has peace with both North and South. Indeed, its relations would be even better with both if US stopped provoking the North. China provokes neither North or South. It wants a peaceful resolution.
Russia has peace with both North and South. Russia doesn’t tell either nation what to do. It respects their own agendas.

But the US? By allowing the South to get rich, the US owns that nation as its chic whore. The US is also culturally imperialist. Russia doesn’t force Russian values on Korea. China doesn’t force Chinese values on Korea. But America is, of course, the ‘exceptional’ and ‘indispensable’ nation, the nation that is more ‘evolved’ and superior because it has massive homo parades and has Bruce Caitlyn Jenner wee wee in a lady’s room. Because the US is so superior because it worships homos and came up with ghetto trash rap music, it has the right to push its icons, idols, and ‘values’ onto other nations, be they South Korea, Vietnam, Turkey, Russia(bad bad nation according to Jews because it doesn’t allow homos to take over Red Square), Iran, Syria, and etc.
US dream of a better Iran is a nation where girls over there dress and act like Lena Dunham and Miley Cyrus, where Iranian men invite black ‘bulls’ to hump their wives in their own bedrooms, and where Iranian children wave homo flags instead of reading the Koran.

According to the US, the Zionists have a right to oppress and occupy Palestinians because… uh… Zionists have ‘gay pride’ parades whereas Palestinians don’t.
Since Koreans have proven themselves to be most loyal, slavish, and servile, the US doesn’t want to lose its whore-and-military-puppet-foothold in the Asian continent.
Koreans are, by nature, a dog-like people. Under Japanese, they were loyal collaborator-puppets of the Nipponese Empire. Under Soviet rule, Koreans in Russia were the most loyal dogs of the Soviet system. No wonder Russia valued Koreans over other minorities. Koreans worked hard and served the system most slavishly.
And under American Empire, Koreans were the most loyal mass-killers of Vietnamese in the War. Koreans work hard, have some talent(look at their economy), and follow orders(since they lack original thinking and independence of mind). So, the US doesn’t want to lose this dog.

Of course, the US has other dogs too, but Koreans are special dogs. Saudis are US dogs too, but Saudis still have some independence. Saudis play along with US foreign policy, but Saudis have pride of culture and heritage as preserver of Mecca and the holy land of Muhammad. So, even though Saudis go along with the US, it has a cultural, spiritual, and moral sovereignty that is independent of Americanism. This has been problematic to the US. Saudi foreign policy runs both parallel and counter to US interests. Saudis will work with the US to weaken or destroy common enemies — usually Shia-dominant nations or secular-modern-Arab nations — , but this can come to bite the US in the ass, as happened on 9/11 when the very Jidadis that US had once funded and used(with the help of Saudis) turned on the US.

In contrast, South Korea has no culture or value system of its own. Whatever it once had seems to have been long forgotten. What is Korean Culture today? Christianity adopted from American Missionaries? Imitation Rap Music? Plastic Surgery to look like Japanese cartoon characters? K-pop that apes hip hop and techo-whore dance music? And growing homomania and worship of Diversity because South Koreans think the US is the model for everything that Koreans must follow.

Saudis play along with the US, but they have a sense of culture and heritage independent of the American Way. In contrast, South Koreans believe their culture has no validity except to imitate whatever happens to be the Current Year in America. Sadly, Japan is going the same way. This is what consumer-globalism does to all nations. Turns them into mindless commodities.

North Korean threat has to be the biggest hype in the world.
But then, the US tried to turn the Georgian molehill into a mountain to antagonize and vilify Russia.
And then, the US turned a mini-crisis in Ukraine into a major crisis to antagonize Russia even further, leading to a series of events that led to Hillary the monster threatening ‘new cold war’ and even war with Russia.

Without US hype, what is North Korea? It is a has-been nation with a ruined economy. It has nukes only to defend itself from the US as a neo-imperialist power. It no longer has China and Russia as sponsors of its ideology. China wants to do business with the whole world. Last thing it wants is war nearby. Russia renounced communism and Stalinism. It has better relations with the South than North.
So, why all the tension? The US is controlled by hyperventilating Jews. But then, these Jews are so nuts that they said Trump is ‘literally Hitler’. They say Trump voters are ‘deplorable white supremacists’. But then, these very Jews who denounce ‘white supremacism’ demand that whites better support Jewish nationalism in Israel and praise Jews to high heaven and even pass laws attacking free speech that is critical of Jewish power and abuses.

North Korean regime is vile, but we have to be realistic. North Korea is a very poor and weak country. And must of its bluster is defensive. It’s like a pufferfish that blows up to look much bigger because it doesn’t want to be swallowed.

This US provocation has three reasons.

1. Keep Korea divided and use South Korea against China.

2. Vilify homogeneous/nationalist North and persuade the South that it has much more to gain with Diversity and race-mixing. After all, if North is into homogeneity and nationalism, it must mean those things lead to failure. But, in fact, didn’t South Korea achieve economic development as a nationalist and homogeneous nation? If race-mixing does wonders, Philippines and Indonesia would have higher per capitas.

3. Strangle North economically so that it won’t be able to do business with Muslim nations hated by Israel as Zionist want Nuclear Supremacism for Israel only. Jews are strange this way. No people rhetorically denounce supremacism as much as Jews do, but then, no people practice their own tribal supremacism as much as Jews do.

Now, the US will continue doing what it is doing because it has no concern for the Koreas, which is just a piece on a chessboard. It is up to the Koreans to have enough sense and courage to wake up and speak truth to globo-US-imperialist power, but then, these Korean dogs only know how to take orders.

PS. Here’s a conspiracy theory which I don’t believe in ‘just saying’ mode.

Maybe it may have some validity as a ‘subconspiracy theory’, meaning the people who came up with the plan didn’t consciously plan it that way but were subconsciously feeling something along those lines. The mind works weird.

There is a pattern in the American attempt to divide China, Korea, and Vietnam.
Why were those three East Asian nations targeted for division?

During WWII, why didn’t the US plan to use Chinese troops to fight the Japanese? China had tons of manpower but not enough weapons. By the beginning of 1945, Japan was crushed at sea and things were bad at home. Japanese troops in China were cut off from supplies and just barely hanging on.

As China had no shortage of troops, US could have equipped masses of Chinese and trained them for basic warfare and threw them at the Japanese. Then, Japanese could have been defeated in China without Soviet entry.
Why did America not consider this? Did the US fear a rise of a united and victorious China?

The only part of the world that could threaten Western world power was in East Asia. Not Africa, not Middle East, not Latin America. Japan, a small nation with limited resources, proved how fast and how much it could rise. So, if China were to emerge victorious in WWII as a united power, what would happen? Rise of yellow peril that may be more threatening that the rise of Japan. After all, China is much bigger than Japan. Indeed, if China had modernized like Japan, and if China had fought the US, it might not have lost the war.

So, instead of helping the KMT to achieve victory against the Japanese, why not allow Soviets to enter from the North and effectively hand over control of Northern China to Mao and the communists. Meanwhile, the southern half would be controlled by Chiang and KMT. That way, China would not one massive united power but a divided nation, like a big version of divided Korea and later divided Vietnam.

According to his conspiracy theory, the US wanted a permanently divided China, with Communists ruling the upper half and Nationalists ruling the lower half. China would remain weaker that way.

Later, US decided to divide another East Asian nation, Vietnam.

In neither China, Korea, or Vietnam did the US try to help their allies unify the nation.
US only tried to maintain the division.
US support of KMT was lukewarm and confused. And US gave no indication that it wanted to help South Korea take North Korea and unify. And US position in Vietnam was defensive. To keep the nation divided than help the South take over the north.
McCarthur did try to unify Korea once the war happened, but that was his whim that Truman’s policy.

As it happened, China and Vietnam did manage to unify. Korea didn’t.

Brits also played on Hindu and Muslim divide in India to weaken the power of the natives.

And in the US, the Jewish elites play on ‘red state’ and ‘blue state’ divide to make sure that one bunch of whites hate another bunch of whites, thus less able to unify against Jewish-globalist domination.

If you fear the emergence of a great power or threat, try to keep it divided.

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Powerful Jewess Ginsburg went to South Korea to 'make an offer Koreans cannot refuse'.

Powerful Jewess Ginsburg went to South Korea to 'make an offer Koreans cannot refuse'.  She will push radical feminism and 'gay marriage' on South Korea.  As Joe Biden said, 85% of the 'gay' agenda was pushed by Jews who control media, entertainment, politicians, and finance. Since Jews spread homomania as the new ideology of the US, it's only natural that it must also be spread to South Korea, a running dog stooge of US imperialism that is now owned by Jews.

In a nutshell, Ginsburg-ism says American Jews know best and South Korea exists only to take 'advice' and orders from America. Koreans can't figure out anything for themselves. They must obey Americans, especially Jewish Americans.


If indeed America is so much about equality, will South Koreans ask why US university system racially discriminates against Asians? Will South Koreans ask why US favors Zionist imperialism over helpless Palestinians? Ginsburg herself is a Zionist. Will South Koreans ask why US and Israel made a bloody mess of Libya and armed terrorist rebels in Syria, thereby turning that country into a burning hell? Will South Koreans ask why Iran was punished with sanctions for decades even though it didn't invade other countries and has no nukes whereas Israel has been showered with billions in aid despite its having 200 illegal nukes and banning all international inspections and its constant acts of aggression against neighboring nations?
Will South Koreans ask why US, supposedly a land of the free, now forces every pastry baker to make 'gay wedding cakes' (or else be sued and ruined) and why people are fired from jobs and destroyed for opposing 'gay marriage'?
South Koreans should ask, do Ginsburg and Jews like her wish that South Korea too will force 'gay marriage' on the entire populace and destroy, fire, and blacklist decent Koreans who will continue to oppose the radical re-definition of marriage(that was spearheaded by Jews)? Will South Koreans ask why 'marriage equality' applies to homosexuals but not to incest-sexuals and polygamists? So much for 'equality'?
Will South Koreans ask why, in a nation that is only 2% Jewish, Jews own 90% of the media? Will South Koreans ask why US preaches about equality but favors Israel over all other nations? Will South Koreans ask why every US Congressman must sign a pledge to AIPAC? Will South Koreans ask why journalists Rick Sanchez and Helen Thomas were fired and blacklisted for being critical of Jewish power in the media? Will South Koreans ask why every Fed chairmen has been a Jew as far as anyone can remember? Will South Koreans ask why Jews are 25% of the Harvard student body even though Jews are only 5% of the US white population? White gentile representation of Harvard is only 20% even though white gentiles are 95% of the white population.
Will South Koreans ask why the US pushes the 'gay agenda' on South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan --- the three puppets of the US --- but not on Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan, India, and other nations?
Will South Koreans ask why US finally resolved issues with Iran and Cuba but not with North Korea? Isn't it because American Jews hate North Korea for having been allies with 'enemies' of Israel and because US desires a permanent division of Korea so that South Korea will remain a puppet client of the US? US opposes unification of Korea because it doesn't want to see the rise in Korean nationalism under unification and a unified Korea growing closer to China. Also, a unified Korea will mean US will no longer have a reason to station troops on the Asian continent.

But South Koreans, being dogs of the Jewish-and-homosexual controlled US, will not ask any such questions. Being good dogs, they will take a subservient position and sit quietly and wag their tails while taking advice --- orders --- from Ginsburg, a powerful Jew, the likes of whom now order all bakeries to be fined and destroyed for not making 'gay wedding cakes' in America. South Koreans and Koream journal's position are quite clear: Jews in America are morally and politically and culturally superior. Koreans are backward and inferior. So, when powerful Jews come to Korea and lecture about 'human rights', Koreans should shut up and listen and take orders. In other words, Koreans are nothing but yellow dogs.

By the way, do Korean judges and leaders come to the US to lecture Americans about 'superior' Korean values and morality? No. Do Koreans go to Israel to tell Jews what to do? No.
Koreans like to mind their own business and respect other nations and their values.
But these Jews think they have the right to come to Korea and lecture Koreans to do as America does because, presumably, South Korea has no values and culture of its own. These Jews, the most unequal and most privileged people in America, dare lecture Koreans about 'equality'.

If Koreans have guts, they should ask this to Ruth Baird Ginsburg:

"Ms. Ginsburg, Koreans were under Japanese colonialism for over three decades. During most of this time, US sided with Japan and supported Japan's rule over Korea. The only reason why US later 'liberated Korea' is because US got into a war with Japan. When Korea was under Japanese rule, no one around the world stood up for Koreans even though Korea was being wiped off the map. Jews didn't champion Korea either. Since the end of WWII, Palestine has been colonized by Jewish Zionist imperialists. Palestinians have been crushed, ethnically cleansed, and they still live under oppression. But the world is silent. Jews use their immense power of media, finance, and politics in the US to drive American foreign policy into supporting Zionist oppression and occupation of Palestine. And because South Koreans are dependent and slavish puppets of the US, they say nothing about the great injustice, even though Palestinians got it worse under Jews than Koreans got it under the Japanese. Ms. Ginsburg, since you love to talk about 'human rights', how do you feel about the ongoing oppression of Palestinians? How do you feel about American Jews using the full might of the US power to aid and abet Israel's colonization of Palestine? And Ms. Ginsburg, do you know that Korea is a divided country because FDR/Truman cut it like a cake and handed half to Stalin to do as he pleased? Koreans had no choice when this happened, just like Palestinians had no choice when the US and USSR decided to aid and abet the Zionist takeover of Palestine. What will US do to fix what it broke? US divided Korea in half, so what will it do bring it together again? Will US own up to what it did, or will it continue to increase tensions between the Koreas in order to permanently keep South Korea as its client state? And if you want to spread human rights, why don't you go to Israel and tell the Jews to own up to what they did to Palestinians. Recently in the bombing of Gaza, 1000s of women and children were killed and maimed. What have you got to say about that as a Jew? And how do you feel about the fact that the Jewish-controlled US fully backed the Zionist mass killing of Palestinians and offered zero condolences to Palestinians? Does a nation like the US have a right to be lecturing other nations about 'human rights'? You say 'gay marriage' is about human rights, but how come you don't push incest marriage? After all, if marriage should be defined by individuals in their own way, why shouldn't a brother marry a sister, mother marry a son, etc? Why favoritism for homosexuals but not for incest-sexuals? Isn't it because homosexuals are the main political and economic allies of Jews? Wall Street, Las Vegas, Walmart, Koch Brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Hollywood, and etc are all for 'gay marriage' because homosexuals are close allies of the globalist oligarchic class. So, 'marriage equality' applies to them but not to incest-sexuals. It's about homo-privilege, not about equality. Only homos, among sexual deviants, are given the right to change the meaning of marriage. And you American Jews seek to spread 'gay marriage' as a proxy of globalist Americana imperialism. You want Korean homos to serve as globalist collaborators promoting globalist interest over national interests. Also, Americans have gutless and imitative Korean-Americans to serve as your lackeys and running dogs. But this is nothing new. During Japanese rule, lots of Koreans studied in Japan, adopted Japanese values and ideology, and sought to impose Japan-ism on Korea. And had Japan and US not ended up fighting one another, Japan would have finished the job, Korea would have been culturally wiped off the map, and US would have supported Japan as an ally, just like US aided and abetted the Zionist imperialist colonization of Palestine."

A person of real integrity would ask that question, but of course, South Koreans, being lapdogs and running dogs, will not. They are cultural slaves and agree with Koream Journal that South Korea is inferior to America, therefore the ONLY WAY South Korea can make progress is by mindlessly obeying and following the US. South Korean elites and Koream Journal don't defend Korea from US, the sole superpower. They serve as collaborators of US cultural imperialism; they are stupid enough to swallow the lie that US stands for 'human rights'. Just ask anyone who was fired, blacklisted, and fired in the US for refusing to bake 'gay wedding' cakes or for criticizing 'gay marriage'. In America, you don't get anywhere IF you're critical of Jewish power or Homosexual power. Some freedom. Some equality. Some human rights. A nation where one must slavishly praise and obey a certain group is not a real democracy. US is now an oligarchy as a Princeton Study showed.

But according to trashy and crass Koream Journal, US is so ahead of everyone else because of its open sewage porn culture, rap gangsta culture, invention of 'twerking', worship of trans-sexuals like Bruce 'Caitlyn' Jenner, tattoo mania, body piercing, out-of-wedlock births, racial tensions, foreign policy that destroys the entire Middle East and messed up Ukraine, and etc.
So, South Korea will have made great progress when Koreans have tattoos all over, pierce their noses, worship transsexuals, celebrate homosexuality and sodomy among men, cheer on Israel's ongoing oppression of Palestinians, and wag their tails and roll over at the behest of their Jewish masters.

Ginsburg isn't going to South Korea to advise. She is really offering an ultimatum. It's a case of "making an offer that South Koreans cannot refuse." Jews fixed it in the US so that one must be pro-homo to do business. And Jews like Ginsburg are saying that in order for South Korea to do business in the US, it has to follow the US social model.

Koreans. What a bunch of worthless and slavish yellow dogs.